I would like to address a few points from the article “Is There a Place for Female Professors at Seminary?” by John Piper. I don’t want to be so naïve and presumptuous to call this a “response to” or “open letter”, since the chances of John Piper ever hearing of this writing by lil’ ol’ me, are… just none. Nevertheless, my biggest concern is the effect that this type of message may have in women within my small circle, and how it could negatively influence the health of the Body of Christ. In short, I believe women need to be encouraged to develop their gifts for the glory of God, not limit them… at least, not any more that the clear plain and simple words of Scripture do. (“Do not go beyond what is written.” 1 Cor. 4:6)

About John Piper.

First of all, let me say that I highly admire and respect John Piper. He is one of the few Christian leaders that has been successful in preaching the word faithfully for years, while keeping himself clear from scandals and moral stains. In spite of his fame, he is still humble, he is an example of someone not given to luxurious excesses, and has been brave in going against the culture when he has seen the need to stand up for racial reconciliation in our cities, and moral character in the political arena.

With all that said, I also believe that we ought to be wise in discerning the degree of truth in what anyone says, whether great or low. As John (the Apostle) writes in his 3rd letter: “do not imitate what is evil, but what is good”.

As speakers, Bible teachers and people on places of public speech prominence (including the internet) we ought to be mindful of stating clearly the difference between our opinion (which may be great, good, bad, etc), and what is Scripture (clearly, plan reading unquestionable).

Furthermore, as hearers, the idea that anything said by someone so highly respected must be right, is at best unwise; at worst idolatrous. We must be Bereans and judge everything against the word of God.

With that said, let me share a few points:

  1. Yes to Complementarianism

Although I tend to stay away from labels, for the sake of this discussion, I believe there is a very strong case to support the tenets of Complementarianism, in so far as the role of Pastor within a local church, and the family. Complementarianism is generally defined as “.. men and women have different but complementary roles and responsibilities in marriage, family life, religious leadership, …”.

When you look at the usage of the Greek word for ‘elder’ In the New Testament, it is very reasonable to conclude that Pastors are to be males only, for various reasons, none of them being inability or inferiority in the part of females. Likewise, I believe it is very clear that the role of a husband as the leader (servant leader, mind you) of the household, and ultimate responsible party, is indisputable.

  1. Seminary is not a church.

However where I get off the bus so-to-peak, and let John Piper alone is starting at this point:

I am going to answer this question as best I can on the assumption that the Bible teaches that churches should be led by a team of spiritual, humble, biblically qualified men (1 Timothy 2:12). In other words, I’m going to base my argument about the seminary on the assumption of complementarianism, which I think is not merely an assumption but a well-founded historic understanding of Scripture.”

Notice that he starts at a true statement from a clear Biblical passage about the church (“the Bible teaches that churches should be led by a team of … men”), to an inserted assumption that seminary should work under the same premise.

Two problems:

A. Seminary is not a church.

The church was:
– Announced by Jesus in Matthew 16:18
– Established in Acts 2, and first called “the church” (‘Ekklesia’, ‘gathering’, ‘assembly’ ) in verse 47.
– Described in its unique characteristics (organization, leadership, discipline structure) in many other passages.

Making seminary of the same level and significance of church, would demand, (aside from Biblical support), the consistent application of other church biblical requirements (discipline? Tithing? Sunday gatherings?)

B. Seminary is an educational institution

On the other hand, seminary is not an institution established by the New Testament. Seminary is a modern development brought up by the convergence of formal education and religion training. Although very useful (mostly), seminary is neither a formal biblical institution, nor a biblical requirement for pastorship. (see: Acts 20:17-38; 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:5-9).

I think the shaping done by “models and mentor” Piper refers to –the character formation of a future pastor (seminary student) is more greatly done by the influence of the Holy Spirit through godly men and women, rather that necessarily an institution.

Now, is knowing scriptures absolutely necessary? Yes! is learning the Bible and being encouraged a good thing? Yes!. Do we have examples of this? Absolutely!. Here three examples:

* Right after Paul and Silas were freed and the Philippian jailer converted, the gospel was preached and soon after “…they went out of the prison and entered the house of Lydia; and when they had seen the brethren, they encouraged them and departed.” Acts 16:40
This went on to become the church in Philippi, to whom Paul wrote the letter of Philippians.

* “24 At that time a Jew named Apollos came to Ephesus. He was an educated man from Alexandria. He knew the Scriptures very well. 25 Apollos had been taught the way of the Lord. He spoke with great power. He taught the truth about Jesus. But he only knew about John’s baptism. 26 He began to speak boldly in the synagogue. Priscilla and Aquila heard him. So they invited him to their home. There they gave him a better understanding of the way of God. ..” 1 Corinthians 2

* “28 The woman then left her waterpot, went her way into the city, and said to the men, 29 “Come, see a Man who told me all things that I ever did. Could this be the Christ?” 30 Then they went out of the city and came to Him… 39 And many of the Samaritans of that city believed in Him because of the word of the woman who testified, “He told me all that I ever did.”,” John 4:27-42

  

  1. The logic behind women teachers in seminary

Now that we have demonstrated that seminary is neither a biblical requirement nor a biblical institution, why could a woman not be instrumental in teaching future church leaders in many areas? Languages, history, counseling,  prayer, exegesis, soteriology, technology; these are by and large knowledge areas that can be very critical for a pastor to know and understand, and that many women can be even more capable that men in teaching. The idea of a woman not being able to teach, let’s say, Counseling, to a future pastor, because she has never been nor will ever be a pastor herself, makes as much sense as:

– an attorney not being able to teach a workshop on Health Regulations to a class of future doctors, or
– a rabbi not being able to teach a course on Religious Cultures to a class of future Army officers, or
– an IT technician teaching PowerPoint to a class of future Science teachers.. and so on…

Just in the same way, what Bible passage prohibits women from teaching (again, outside of the pastor’s position) the Word of God and the many related aspects related to it? None that I can find.

In summary: God gave gifts to both men and women. Let’s let women feel free to explore and develop their God given potential in using their gifts in teaching and serving –even without being the pastors, for the building of the church.

In a society and time so marked by biblical illiteracy, imagine what would happen if more and more of our wives and mothers and daughters and teen girls, and female college students found their call, received the support and had the environments to develop their skills? Why not give it a shot?

 

  • Think soberly, as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith.. 6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, … or ministry, …..” Romans 12
  • 7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all: 8 for to one is given the word of wisdom … the word of knowledge … faith … healings …” 1 Corinthians 12
  • 7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ’s gift. … 11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ,” Ephesians 4
  • 10 As each one has received a gift, minister it to one another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God. 11 If anyone speaks, … If anyone ministers, ..” 1 Peter 4
Advertisements

Easter is my most favorite holiday of all. Often I hear people wondering, “why do Christians celebrate a death?”. The answer is simple, it wasn’t just a death. It was way more than that. As Paul explains it in 1 Corinthians 15 it is about, not only the death, but the burial and bodily resurrection, according to the Scriptures –and on the resurrection, everything we believe as Christians hangs on:

“And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty” 1 Cor 15:14

Among several key awesome reasons that excite me about the cross we have:

  • The sins we all have committed (are committing, and will commit- see here) which put every human being in enmity with God (see here), rendering us as dead in our relationship with God (see here), were fully paid for. It is done! [TETELESTAI]
  • By raising from the dead, Jesus proved he is God in human body (see here), thus validating everything he said, including the authority and veracity of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures (Old Testament and New Testament). (No more wondering whether the Jonah story is true  🙂 )
  • Not only that, but through the resurrection we get a glimpse of God’s three-persons-in-one-God nature, as scriptures teach that God raised Jesus from the dead (Rom. 10:9, 1 Pet. 1:21), The Father raised Jesus from the dead (Gal. 1:1, Eph. 1:17,20), The Son raised himself from the dead (John 2:19-21), and The Holy Spirit raised Jesus from the dead (Romans 8:11).

 

Nevertheless, there is one particular reason that pumps me up to celebrate Jesus’ dead and resurrection this year.

It all started when I considered verses that describe Jesus as “The only begotten Son” (See John 1:14, 18; 3:16, 18; 1 John 4:9), or being begotten [born?] (Hebrews 5:5). That would make sense if related to Jesus’ human birth at Bethlehem, but not as the Son, since as such Jesus is from everlasting to everlasting.

Upon looking up and comparing from the Greek sources, and reading some Greek-beginner-friendly sources, I realized that The Greek term that some Bibles (BLB, NASB, KJV, NKJV) translate into English as “begotten” [g3439 μονογενής monogenēs]   does not mean “only born” but “unique”, as seen used in other passages such as Hebrews 11:17, where Isaac is called ‘monogenēs’ –not only “born”, as Abraham did have other children besides Isaac, but “unique”. Other modern translations render this term more properly “the one and only” (NIV, NLT, ESV etc).

 

So far so good, but we still have the issue with Psalm 2:7 Hebrews 1:5 and 5:5 in which we have God telling Jesus “You are My Son, Today I have begotten You” (KJV, NKJV). Since the Greek word used here [g1080 γεννάω gennaō] means to be born,  one would assume it refers to Jesus –as man, being born in Bethlehem 2,000 years ago. But that would mean that at some point, he wasn’t, contradicting John 1:1 and other passages. So I searched more.

First, I discovered through searching for what “begotten” may have meant in Jewish culture, that in most of ancient cultures, kings were considered sons of god or sons of heaven, or in some cultures, gods themselves (Romans, Egyptians, Assyrians). However, they were not considered ‘gods’ from birth, but from the moment they were enthroned as kings. It was at that time that they were “begotten” as gods. The term “begotten: was customary of meaning “enthronement as king” (see here)

 

Second, we have Psalm 2, as understood by Jewish traditions as a Messianic Psalm –that is, a prophecy about the coming Messiah (Jesus Christ). Evidently, a poem about the Messiah’s enthronement as king.

Fast forward about a thousand years to Antioch somewhere around year 47AD, when Paul and his companions went to a synagogue on the Sabbath day, and Paul was invited to speak (Acts 13:14-41). As Paul began to speak, he gave a summary of Israel’s history starting with Egypt (v17), the wilderness (v18), the judges (v20), David (v22), and how from king David’s seed, the Savior Jesus would come (v23). Then he continued with John the Baptist introduction of Jesus (v24-25), all the way to Jesus’ death (v28), burial (v29), and resurrection (v30 “…But God raised Him from the dead”). He continues on:

“31 He was seen for many days by those who came up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who are His witnesses to the people.
32 And we declare to you glad tidings—that promise which was made to the fathers.
33 God has fulfilled this for us their children, in that He has raised up Jesus” Acts 13:31-33

And then he gives what by inspiration of the Holy Spirit is the one prophecy –of kingly enthronement, being fulfilled at the resurrection:

As it is also written in the second Psalm: ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You.’” Acts 13:33

Ending with “34 And that He raised Him from the dead, no more to return to corruption…”.

We have the same context of resurrection and enthronement in Hebrews 1:5 and similarly, but connected to his role as priest, in Hebrews 5:5.

Therefore, what we celebrate on Easter is not just a death –a horrible death of an innocent man, or our sins forgiven by God made man, but the enthronement of our King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Jesus Christ!! (see also here). That ladies and gentlemen, is a far glorious reason to celebrate and rejoice!

 

Long… Eternally live the King!!

Treating God like the pope

Posted: September 25, 2015 in Life, Me and God

It has been concluded by many who are well versed with official Catholic doctrine, that the pope is in some way “like God” and hence he should be, in some ways, treated like God. Aside from the merits of such argument and whether or not this is doctrinally sound and ultimately trustworthy, or worth abiding to, I have sadly noticed that I (and perhaps many of us Americans) tend to do more the opposite, to treat God like the pope. Please allow me to explain.

The praise: There are a lot sublime-sounding phrases and verbiage to refer to the pope: “Your Holiness”, “Vicar of Christ”, “Vicar of Peter”, “Holy Father”, ”His Holiness”, “The Rock”, ”Shepherd of the Universal Church”, and many other capitalized tittles that echo with designations only given to God in the scriptures. Furthermore, his visit has taken over the news coverage and taken primacy in many conversations –a lot of people who you had never heard talking about faith, seem to be the most faithful believers this week.

The pull: Besides praising the pope’s importance, many emphasize –often quasi-stretching the truth, on how the pope’s views are in line with their own. Many liberal-leaning representatives would say “The pope urged congress with left-leaning message”. Likewise, the conservative side would say something like “Pope reminds us of the value of life before birth”. Everybody quotes and affirms the pope in what they agree; when they can use him to their advantage and to move their political ball against their opposition.

The drift: However, we all know that if the pope were to say “Mr. Obama, ban all abortions!”, or “Republicans! Grant citizenship to all illegal immigrants!”, no action would take place. Suddenly, the clear instructions from “His Holiness”, the great “Holy Father” would be far less than mere suggestions from some international figurehead that doesn’t apply to us necessarily.

 

And that’s how I have often treated God like the pope. I praise God, use his wonderful glorious names and address him with the highest theological concepts I have learned. I even quote Him when His Word helps promote my agenda. However, so often, at the moment He requires something from me; obedience, a sacrifice, repentance, a change in my opinion or actions, I treat Him –God, like if His command were far less than a mere suggestion from some figurehead that doesn’t apply to me necessarily.

I hope it is evident that I am not at all advocating for treating the pope like God. But I did find myself considering this week that verse that states

These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me… (Isaiah 29:13)….

…and I was challenged.


Flags

Today is a good day to consider one of my favorite quotes: “inconsistency is the sign of a failed argument”. When facing controversial topics in this week’s news cycle such as the Confederate Flag and Same Sex Marriage, I suggest to keep a few things in mind that may save some time, pain, and reputation.

Is arguing with everyone profitable?

It seems to me that in general when it comes to debating arguments, there are two types of people: those who are willing to listen and consider, and those who no matter what, will stick to their pre-established opinion. Arguing with the latter, is usually a waste of time and a trap to fall into losing your mind –and temper; arguing with the former, has the potential of bearing some fruit. Therefore, I would suggest focusing on interchanging ideas with one who is willing to civilly and decently speak, listen and consider, and also, I suggest to strive to be one who’s civility and decency to speak and listen encourages others to dialog. Especially if you are a Christian, be aware and avoid the point in which your desire to argue for the truth, can quickly become the destruction of your and Christianity’s reputation.

Focus on form just as much as content.

It’s been said that people have the ability of cursing you and still make you feel good; or others, the ability to yelling at you, punching you in the face, stealing your lunch, and still somehow make you feel like asking for forgiveness. I hope these two make sense as analogies pointing to this skill of expressing opposing views accurately enough (content) while still having such grace and respect (form) that the other person doesn’t feel the need to raise a barrier of defense and ignore what you said. I‘ve noticed many times that the good content of someone’s message can be nullified by their bad form. I have also seen bad content being transmitted with such grace and politeness, that it makes the bad argument credible. I suggest to strive to communicate arguments without offensive words or calling names, avoiding exaggerated hyperbole and unnecessary diminishing comparisons. Especially if you are a Christian, I am not sure Jesus jumps with joy when you diminish, insult or offend someone.

Be consistent with your own arguments.

This is the heart of this writing. I have come to conclude that nothing shots someone off to hearing what you have to say, more than expressing irrational, incongruent or inconsistent arguments. Independently of how right or wrong your premise may be, being consistent may help you to make your point in a respectful way. Let me give you some examples, not without being upfront in that (1) every analogy falls somehow short from the complete intended meaning, and (2) I am not advocating for any particular idea below, but rather for a consistent presentation of whichever position one holds:

 

  • There are some who oppose to “banning the confederate flag” (external), because “it is not going to solve the racism problem” (internal). However, often times they are the same who claim that we need to “ban Same Sex Marriage” (external), to solve the “gay problem” (internal). It sounds that either you stand for freedom for people to do what they want to do (fly flag and Same Sex Marriage), in spite of who may be offended, or ruling a prohibition of both…. And how this same argument principle could be carried out to other issues: crosses, Bibles and bumper stickers in public places, Gay pride rainbow flag etc.
  • If you as a Christian advocate to change a law for freedom of religion, so that Christians can be legally allowed to pray in certain places or express their faith in certain ways, are you willing to concede the same liberties to Muslims, Mormons and …. Maybe Atheists? Or, if you oppose to –say, allowing the Quran to be studied at a schools, shouldn’t you be opposed to studying the Bible at schools?
  • If you believe that Christianity’s central message is one of sacrifice, and you claim you would give anything up for the sake of Christ, would you be willing to give up the confederate flag, your right to oppose marriage for homosexuals or the rights to express your faith publicly, so that bridges of dialogue are built towards people of other color, sexual orientation and faiths?

 

Stand for what matters.

As I mentioned before, I am not necessarily advocating for either point necessarily. I know there are plenty of views about these three topics both in the public and political sphere, as well as within various religious schools of thought –many with good, reasonable, and convincing arguments. Nevertheless I wonder if for anyone who believes in Jesus as God in human body who came to save, the faithfulness and integrity of the Bible, the great commandment, the great commission, and the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman, would be easier to communicate and reason with others the message of the Gospel, if he/she gives up certain rights –for the sake of a higher call of love.

Consider Paul, who circumcised Timothy, not because he had to (he had the right from God not to), but in order to create a bridge to the Jews, he chose to give up a right for a higher call of love (Acts 16:1-3). How many Jews came to faith in Jesus through this gesture who, ironically enough, understood they did not have to be circumcised?

I wonder, if Christians were willing to give up certain legal rights, how many people would, through that gesture, open their attention, and come to faith in Jesus, ultimately agreeing with those argued-over Biblical principles Christians stand for, not forced to obey, but willingly from their hearts.

 


A few nights ago my 4 year-old asked me what it will be like when we die. As I tried to put it in a simple, pre-k-way to understand it, I started explaining that as soon as we close our eyes in physical death, we will open them back up in the presence of God.

Then she asked “what will we feel?” I proceeded to explain that we were going to be given a newer better version of our current body, similar to what we have today, but much better, like Jesus after the resurrection, a newer/better body that can move from here to there at the speed of thought, a body that has nothing bad and it is all good, a body that kind of looks like us today, but better, a body…like…like …like a SUPERHERO!!.. yeap, that’s how I explained it, that’s how it came out…. WE WILL BECOME SUPERHEROES!!……..And the more I think about it… it makes sense in more than one way.

When I think about it, the day I heard the message of salvation and what God had done for me, and what He was offering me as a free gift, I confessed with my mouth and believed in my heart that He –Jesus, is God, lived, died, was buried, and rose again according to scripture. At that moment, I was born again spiritually and Christ righteousness or ‘good standing before God’ became my standing before God. From that point, when God looks at Luis, God no longer sees Luis the sinner and all his past failures and shortcomings. Instead, God sees Jesus perfection on my behalf, when God looks at me, he sees Jesus, and when I direct myself to God, I can do so it as if I was Jesus –or ‘in His name”.

Iron+Man_wallpapers_274

Thus, when it comes to our relationship with God, we are like Ironman. When people see Ironman, they see the strong, admirable, multi-weapon super hero (IN whom Tony Stark is), and not the mere weak, fragile, human Tony Stark. In the same way, from the moment we were saved, when God looks at us, God sees Jesus’ righteousness. As far as God is concerned, we are in Jesus and all who Jesus is in relation to the father, we are (accepted, beloved, righteous etc.), and no longer the sinner we once were.

Now imagine how our lives could change, if we could live out this reality ALL THE TIME. How would it change our prayer life from early in the morning? How would it change the way we relate to our spouses, friends, neighbors?

How would it change our daily fears and emotions of inadequacy, rejection, pride and worries?

How different could our lives potentially be if we constantly have present the fact that since we are IN CHRIST:

We are complete in Him Who is the Head of all principality and power (Colossians 2:10).

We have the Greater One living in us; greater than he who is in the world (1 John 4:4).

We can do all things through Christ Jesus (Philippians 4:13).

We are God’s workmanship, created in Christ unto good works (Ephesians 2:10).

We are a new creature in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17).

We are joint-heir with Christ (Romans 8:17).

We are raised up with Christ and seated in heavenly places (Ephesians 2:6; Colossians 2:12).

That there is NOW NO condemnation for us who are in Christ (Rom 8:1)

That in Christ we are accepted, loved, forgiven, empowered etc etc….


As our men’s group dives into the book of Colossians, we’ve come across the end of chapter 1 where the preeminence of Jesus Christ is declared over all creation, and over the church. This prompted me to look into what the Bible says about the church. Of course, the whole New Testament is about the church in a great sense. Nevertheless, this article focuses particularly in all the instances in which the original Greek word ‘ekklesia –which is translated into English “church”, is used in the New Testament. (click here to see the list of verses)

First of all, I found that that word ‘ekklesia is used about 112 times, of which only 4 times it refers to a civil assembly of people other than a church or body of believers. (see: Acts 7:38; 19:32; 19:39; 19:41).

The local church.

UntitledSecond, I found that of the 112 appearances of ‘ekklesia’, about 85 of them refer to a local church (understood as a body of believers that meet in a home or city, much like saying First Baptist Somewhereville or Nowhereville Community Church). Of those 85 instances, many are historical recounts, or directed to specific local churches of that time –some may argue, with some application perhaps to the local churches today. Nevertheless, of those 85, there are only about 28 occasions that clearly are instructions to local churches today, we find topics addressed such as dealing with Christians who refuse to repent, giving, proper exercise of gifts of the Spirit,   male-female roles, enduring in the faith, conduct, dealing with differences of opinion, prayer, and leadership and feeding the Word of God to the believers, (see verses here). Consider what these 28 verses are about and -especially, what they are NOT about.

The global church

On the other hand, we find 36 instances where the Greek word ‘ekklesia’ is used as it relates to the global church, or sometimes called by theologians, the invisible church, not a local organization, but the combination of all true believers in the world. Here I am defining true Christians as those who accept and believe the core doctrines of orthodox historical Christianity (that Jesus is God in a human body, that He lived, died to pay for the penalty of sin of those who believe by grace alone through faith alone; and rose again bodily, ascended to the father, and will comeback one day). Those who believe in this gospel would be the global church –the body of Christ. When we look at these 36 passages about the church as the global body of believers, we find that they discuss issues such as the unity of all believers as one, our identity as holy, separated unto God, the respect, care and proper attitude towards the global church as the body of Christ, the centrality and preeminence of Christ as the head, the glory honor, faithfulness and subjection that believers owe to Christ, the love, priority and supreme concern of God for His people’s well being, and the importance of ‘membership’ into the global church. (see verses here)

Now, perhaps a side to side comparison may help us to see more clearly the differences between the focus and emphasis of the local church, vs the global church:

Untitled3

Perhaps you noticed the same thing I did. When it comes to the local church, most of the emphasis seems to be in conduct and organization. On the contrary, the verses that deal with the global church focus more on identity, respect, loyalty, and the supremacy of Christ over all.

Conclusions

The principle that this seems to show concerns me and convicts me greatly, as it seems to me that more often than not we seem to be more concerned and more militant for our local church’s identity, respect to, loyalty, and ‘supremacy’. Conversely, we sometimes seem to care more for the proper conduct and organization of other Christians, as opposed to our local church. In reality, maybe we should be more militant for identity, respect towards, loyalty to, and the ‘supremacy’ of the global church -the body of Christ, and less dogmatic about a church brand, church name or church denomination. Likewise, we might want to look more into the conduct and organization of our own local church.

Indeed, we seem to pay more attention to what are good reasons to leave,  and what are bad reasons to leave a local church (to go to another one), and not so much if someone may be leaving the faith altogether.

Often, although we say our ‘mission’ is to “make disciples [of Jesus]”, we actually seem to demonstrate with our actions, time and money, that we care more for our particular brand of Christianity or church name –what I often call ‘church franchising’. When a local church ‘vision’ (which is often and wrongly justified by Prov 29:18)  is taken to the level that hurts the people -the body of Christ, for the sake of human strategies, we may be getting away from accomplishing God’s mission to make disciples of Christ.

Although I recognize that this is not an exhaustive study and that the issue may not be very easily identified, we might do well in considering whether or not there may be some truth to it, even if in the slightest sense. I could be completely wrong… But what if…

Maybe we need to get back to finding out what the Bible teaches about local church dealings and abide to it, and give less credence to human and brand-marketing business-like strategies. Church might deal with people and money, but church is not a business, at least I don’t think God thinks that way.

Maybe we need to rethink how we view the local church in light of what is said and especially what is not said about it in the scriptures.

No local church is perfect, and as they say “if you find it, don’t join it or you will ruin it”. Nevertheless, maybe we need to rethink how we view the global church -the body of believers, and give to it the preeminence, respect and allegiance it demands and deserves. Likewise, maybe we need to rethink and refocus how we see, and almost worship, local churches and church brands. After all, among local churches, there is more that we have in common than what we differ. It is noteworthy to realize that historically, it has been when those walls of separation between denominations and local names have come down, that God has brought revival to communities across the land.


For the longest time I have wanted to write a book about the balance between “Christian dichotomies”, that is, Biblical principles that seem to be contradictory, like loving kids tenderly, vs. disciplining them, or doing things because you have to –out of obligation (which sounds legalistic), vs. out of love when you really feel like…. Or being spontaneous letting the Holy Spirit flow freely vs. planning and being prepared to be used by Him.

This came to mind because as I think of my life the last 40 years, I can’t help it but see awesome things happening in my life. My parents came to know Christ because some faithful small group leader kept on inviting them to church. Although they rejected the invitation several times, it wasn’t until I, as a ~6 month’s old baby, was dying in the hospital due to a respiratory illness, that my father saw no other option but to let these “Christians” pray for the baby, and a miracle happened. I was healed virtually immediately, started eating and here I am four decades later.

That was just the beginning. Since then, I have been privileged with having a fairly easy understanding of academics, especially music, math and languages. I have enjoyed pretty good friends, and even though growing up in a third world country, and in spite of living in poverty, I never knew we were poor -not that poor at least. Going into my teenage years I never had any major social problems and even when my dad walked away from the family, I always had some ‘father figure’ teaching me the basics of life such as driving, shooting, or camping. I have always enjoyed of very good jobs with very good companies and typically have gone up in the corporate ladder pretty quickly. I have traveled, enjoyed some of the finest restaurants, hotels and places. I have been privileged to meet and learn from Baptists, Presbyterians, Charismatics, and atheists, from various languages, cultures and walks in life. I had the opportunity to move to United States and today I have a house and a car and a job that the little 10-year old Luis would have never even imagined possible. I have a beautiful, hard working, godly woman as a wife, and kids that bring me joy and pride every single day.

When I was in my late teens I made a list of goals and how would I accomplish them, with dates and milestones. Not long ago I realized, I pretty much accomplished them all –or did even better.

Does it sound like I’m bragging? I kind of am. In fact, I have gotten used to friends telling me “you have a star” or “you are so lucky” and it is kind of true. My answer always is, “yes I have a ‘star’, His name is Jesus!”.

You see, anyone who has spent sometime around me knows that I am a very regular guy, not rich, not a genius, not even close to perfect in my walk at all. When I look back I can see how many times I have messed up, been lazy, dishonest and merely sinful, I have made mistakes and sometimes paid for them. Still, I see so many good things that my only explanation is: God loves me and gave me the life I live, the opportunities I find myself in, and the abilities I possess, for a reason. He, God, has been my provider, my helper, my protector and literally, the father to this fatherless. He has done it all, he deserves the glory, I am nothing but a story of God’s grace.

With that being said, coming back to the dichotomies, I would be doing a disservice to my kids if I didn’t teach them also that God, through my mother, other role figures, and experiences, has taught me that success happens when opportunity and preparation meet. Our job, no matter who we are, where we were born, and what we were born with, is to make the best of our resources and talents. Whether born in a third world country or in a country club in Manhattan, we all have limitations and abilities, that is the hand we were handed, and that’s that we have to play with, plan and use.

I’m pretty convinced that if you work hard, and seek to be best at whatever you do, success will come. Maybe not the success you thought, or success as defined by others, but success born out of knowing you did your best, and accomplished something. Choices have consequences and if I can instill this life principle in my kids, they will avoid so much pain and reap so much success.

It’s been a fun 40 years, but I still have lots of plans, dreams and goals. I don’t feel too old, this is just a springboard to greater success. Moses left his homeland at 40 and his real known actions were just starting. Joshua fought the battle of Jericho way beyond his 40’s, Saul of tarsus (Paul), also around his 40’s, went from a Christian’s killer to the influencer of the Gospel to the non-Jewish world for 2 millennia. Jean Eugene Atget, now considered one of the world’s greatest photographers, did not begin until he was 40. Renowned American folk artist Grandma Moses did not take up her craft until she was in her 70s and, Terri Tapper, at age 50, became the oldest female certified kiteboard instructor in the USA (and possibly the world). Harland Sanders was steamboat pilot, insurance salesman, farmer, and railroad fireman, but it wasn’t until his 40’s when he started cooking chicken, and becoming famous as the Kentucky Fried Chicken Mogul. Justinian’s codification of Roman Law, Mark Twain’s Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Mother Teresa’s humanitarian legacy, and many many more great things have been accomplished after that ‘mid-life’ time.

So, maybe I’m not writing that dichotomies book yet, however if I was to write a book about my life today, and considering all the great things that have happened and the greatest things yet to be done, my book would be called “My First Forty years”.